Saturday, January 23, 2010
buses and insects
funny how a bus smells similar to when an insect gets squished. reminded me of this little-black-dot-of-a-creature that used to give out this most obnoxious smell when squished (incidentally, this is what i was doing in some "classes" --tracking/squishing insects :-) ). cant describe either the smell or the insect (didnt have any distinguishing feature beyond just looking like a black dot). but if anyone has any clue what the heck im talking about, id be very curious to know the name of that insect.
Sunday, November 01, 2009
"projects"
Project is a self-contained phrase and may or not be capable of elaboration. I come across the word in newspapers and among academicians, engineers and adventurers. One might hear the word and keep quiet, no probing further. Sometimes a project might involve nothing more than swatting flies and sending reports to the headquarters.
-- the talkative man.
-- the talkative man.
Monday, August 24, 2009
Saturday, June 27, 2009
known knowns, known unknowns, unknown unknowns, and unknown knowns!
the line between what you know and what you are guessing is often blurred!
based on my own experiences from quiz/trivia contests and minesweeper -- i have vague guesses that i cant possibly have pulled out at random -- must have been the case that i subconsciously know some connection but do not consciously realize it.
problem is that explicitly keeping track of what you know is hard! some stuff gets internalized to the point where its not clear if its some guesswork/luck or if its some subconscious
knowing
based on my own experiences from quiz/trivia contests and minesweeper -- i have vague guesses that i cant possibly have pulled out at random -- must have been the case that i subconsciously know some connection but do not consciously realize it.
problem is that explicitly keeping track of what you know is hard! some stuff gets internalized to the point where its not clear if its some guesswork/luck or if its some subconscious
knowing
does dhoni read gladwell?
http://www.cricinfo.com/wivind2009/content/current/story/410717.html
"He's good. He will improve, the more international cricket he plays the better
for him," Dhoni said, suggesting that youngsters ought to be given more
exposure at the international stage. "Most of the players who play at the
international level have the talent - it's just that some players get more
backing than others. Some are considered match-winners and often match-winners
are given more time compared to others."
strangely reminiscent of the basic hypothesis/claim in "outliers" by malcolm gladwell
"He's good. He will improve, the more international cricket he plays the better
for him," Dhoni said, suggesting that youngsters ought to be given more
exposure at the international stage. "Most of the players who play at the
international level have the talent - it's just that some players get more
backing than others. Some are considered match-winners and often match-winners
are given more time compared to others."
strangely reminiscent of the basic hypothesis/claim in "outliers" by malcolm gladwell
Thursday, February 19, 2009
qotd
History is an unforgiving laboratory. Its experiments can be run only once, and never again under precisely the same conditions.
-- Blunder, Zachary Shore
-- Blunder, Zachary Shore
Sunday, November 30, 2008
ski tags on jackets
why dont people remove the ski tags on their jackets?
i can think of three reasons:
1. some sort of medal of honor/badge of courage that people like to flaunt?
2. do the ski folks make it very difficult to remove to get free advertising?
3. the tag actually helps by making it easy to zip/unzip your jacket even with your gloves on. so people leave them on for utility!
2 seems a bit far-fetched and too much of a conspiracy theory. 1 doesnt make sense; skiing seems commonplace enough that its not a uniquely distinguishing feature to flaunt. so im going with 3. if 3 is true, it makes a strong case for jacket manufacturers to adopt this.
p.s. im ignoring the possibility that people are lazy/dont care enough to remove them.
i can think of three reasons:
1. some sort of medal of honor/badge of courage that people like to flaunt?
2. do the ski folks make it very difficult to remove to get free advertising?
3. the tag actually helps by making it easy to zip/unzip your jacket even with your gloves on. so people leave them on for utility!
2 seems a bit far-fetched and too much of a conspiracy theory. 1 doesnt make sense; skiing seems commonplace enough that its not a uniquely distinguishing feature to flaunt. so im going with 3. if 3 is true, it makes a strong case for jacket manufacturers to adopt this.
p.s. im ignoring the possibility that people are lazy/dont care enough to remove them.
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
hack to break reviewer anonymity
a rather straightforward hack to break the anonymity of reviewers for peer-reviewed publications (most places at least ensure single-blind submission -- author names are public but reviewing is anonymous)
wonder if this has been tried before to figure out who is reviewing your paper?
1. put some results/theorems in a separate file (preferably these are genuine)
2. give a url submissionid_conference.googlepages.com/filename for the file (probably works much better if the submission is double blind -- if author names are also suppressed and all hints to author identity are explicitly removed, then you can just create something and justify why you created a webpage for the additional stuff from 1 -- linking to your homepage would sacrifice author anonymity :-) )
3. add some webtracking thing to the url and see where you are getting hits from
assuming you can filter out spurious hits/click spam and check for actual views (e.g., .edu or city names), you should have a fairly reasonable idea of who is reviewing
(inspired in part by a recent paper that cited itself for motivation :-) )
wonder if this has been tried before to figure out who is reviewing your paper?
1. put some results/theorems in a separate file (preferably these are genuine)
2. give a url submissionid_conference.googlepages.com/filename for the file (probably works much better if the submission is double blind -- if author names are also suppressed and all hints to author identity are explicitly removed, then you can just create something and justify why you created a webpage for the additional stuff from 1 -- linking to your homepage would sacrifice author anonymity :-) )
3. add some webtracking thing to the url and see where you are getting hits from
assuming you can filter out spurious hits/click spam and check for actual views (e.g., .edu or city names), you should have a fairly reasonable idea of who is reviewing
(inspired in part by a recent paper that cited itself for motivation :-) )
qotd
We zone out, we chicken out, we deceive. To be human is to fight a lifelong uphill battle for self-control. Why? Because evolution left us clever enough to set reasonable goals but without the willpower to see them through
-- Kluge, Gary Marcus
-- Kluge, Gary Marcus
Thursday, October 23, 2008
Saturday, September 20, 2008
one more bit is enough
i have this perpetual confusion with restrooms in restaurants/hotels in figuring if they are single-access or can allow parallel-access. theres always some doubt involved in whether the protocol should be to knock or try to open the door. if only they gave one more bit of information -- on whether the design is single/multiple access, the confusion would go away.
(this seems like an obvious thing to patent :-) )
(this seems like an obvious thing to patent :-) )
words/phrases i hate in papers ..
1. we present something "novel"
2. we are the "first" to introduce/solve the problem
3. we develop "sophisticated techniques/algorithm" to solve the problem
4. we make the following "contributions" (long list of trivialities..)
i guess what is irritating is that all of these are for the reader to assess and judge; not for the writer to claim/assume. sadly, with the realities of the the reviewing process and often the short-attention span of reviewers, the only work that sees that light of day are those that explicitly spoonfeed the reviewer with such keywords.
(im certain i have been/will be guilty of these at some point)
2. we are the "first" to introduce/solve the problem
3. we develop "sophisticated techniques/algorithm" to solve the problem
4. we make the following "contributions" (long list of trivialities..)
- ..
- ..
- ..
i guess what is irritating is that all of these are for the reader to assess and judge; not for the writer to claim/assume. sadly, with the realities of the the reviewing process and often the short-attention span of reviewers, the only work that sees that light of day are those that explicitly spoonfeed the reviewer with such keywords.
(im certain i have been/will be guilty of these at some point)
Friday, September 12, 2008
suboptimal routing
September 12, 2008 10:22 AM Sortation Center Departure GROVE CITY, OH
September 11, 2008 7:50 PM Sortation Center Arrival GROVE CITY, OH
September 11, 2008 1:12 AM Sortation Center Departure ORLANDO, FL
September 9, 2008 9:13 AM Sortation Center Arrival LEETSDALE, PA
September 6, 2008 3:25 AM Sortation Center Departure NEW BERLIN, WI
September 5, 2008 5:38 AM Sortation Center Arrival NEW BERLIN, WI
September 4, 2008 5:08 AM Sortation Center Departure DALLAS, TX
September 3, 2008 3:34 PM Sortation Center Arrival DALLAS, TX
September 3, 2008 2:40 PM Pickup CARROLLTON, TX
the bloody place is 32mins from the intended destination. i could have had this shipment three days back!
September 11, 2008 7:50 PM Sortation Center Arrival GROVE CITY, OH
September 11, 2008 1:12 AM Sortation Center Departure ORLANDO, FL
September 9, 2008 9:13 AM Sortation Center Arrival LEETSDALE, PA
September 6, 2008 3:25 AM Sortation Center Departure NEW BERLIN, WI
September 5, 2008 5:38 AM Sortation Center Arrival NEW BERLIN, WI
September 4, 2008 5:08 AM Sortation Center Departure DALLAS, TX
September 3, 2008 3:34 PM Sortation Center Arrival DALLAS, TX
September 3, 2008 2:40 PM Pickup CARROLLTON, TX
the bloody place is 32mins from the intended destination. i could have had this shipment three days back!
Tuesday, September 09, 2008
Sunday, August 10, 2008
qotd
why is it that people who can't take advice always insist on giving it?
-- bond, "casino royale"
-- bond, "casino royale"
Tuesday, August 05, 2008
on father's/mother's day
"this invented holiday was never part of our emotional calendar."
-- from "the diving bell and the butterfly"
-- from "the diving bell and the butterfly"
Monday, July 28, 2008
real world hack .. free shipping
imagine a store X that has both a physical and online presence. X offers only free shipping if your purchase exceeds Y$, however it allows you to return the purchased items in-store without charge.
simple hack (discovered by accident): purchase items worth more than Y$ (including whatever you really want). return the undesired items in-store once they arrive. u effectively got the desired item shipped for free :-) (modulo the cost of having to go and return in store)
simple hack (discovered by accident): purchase items worth more than Y$ (including whatever you really want). return the undesired items in-store once they arrive. u effectively got the desired item shipped for free :-) (modulo the cost of having to go and return in store)
driving violations
do people driving fancier cars get bigger fines for similar violations compared to people who drive more ordinary/rundown cars?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)